[Majorityrights News] What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve? Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 21 September 2024 22:55. [Majorityrights Central] An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. [Majorityrights Central] Slaying The Dragon Posted by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. [Majorityrights Central] The legacy of Southport Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. [Majorityrights News] Farage only goes down on one knee. Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. [Majorityrights News] An educated Russian man in the street says his piece Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 19 June 2024 17:27. [Majorityrights Central] Freedom’s actualisation and a debased coin: Part 1 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 07 June 2024 10:53. [Majorityrights News] Computer say no Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 09 May 2024 15:17. [Majorityrights News] Be it enacted by the people of the state of Oklahoma Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 27 April 2024 09:35. [Majorityrights Central] Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. [Majorityrights News] Moscow’s Bataclan Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. [Majorityrights News] Soren Renner Is Dead Posted by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. [Majorityrights News] Collett sets the record straight Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. [Majorityrights Central] Patriotic Alternative given the black spot Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. [Majorityrights Central] On Spengler and the inevitable Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. [Majorityrights News] Alex Navalny, born 4th June, 1976; died at Yamalo-Nenets penitentiary 16th February, 2024 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 16 February 2024 23:43. [Majorityrights News] A Polish analysis of Moscow’s real geopolitical interests and intent Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 06 February 2024 16:36. [Majorityrights Central] Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 24 January 2024 10:49. [Majorityrights News] Savage Sage, a corrective to Moscow’s flood of lies Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 12 January 2024 14:44. [Majorityrights Central] Twilight for the gods of complacency? Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. [Majorityrights Central] Milleniyule 2023 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 December 2023 13:11. [Majorityrights Central] A Russian Passion Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 December 2023 01:11. [Majorityrights Central] Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 02 December 2023 00:39. [Majorityrights News] The legacy of Richard Lynn Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 31 August 2023 22:18. [Majorityrights Central] Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part three Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 27 August 2023 00:25. [Majorityrights Central] A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity’s origin Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 25 July 2023 22:19. [Majorityrights Central] The True Meaning of The Fourth of July Posted by James Bowery on Sunday, 02 July 2023 14:39. [Majorityrights News] Is the Ukrainian counter-offensive for Bakhmut the counter-offensive for Ukraine? Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 18 May 2023 18:55. [Majorityrights News] Charles crowned king of anywhere Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 07 May 2023 00:05. [Majorityrights News] Lavrov: today the Kinburn Spit, tomorrow the (New) World (Order) Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 07 April 2023 11:04. [Majorityrights Central] On an image now lost: Part One Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 07 April 2023 00:33. [Majorityrights News] The Dutch voter giveth, the Dutch voter taketh away Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 18 March 2023 11:30. [Majorityrights Central] News of Daniel Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 03 March 2023 05:18. [Majorityrights Central] A year in the trenches Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 28 February 2023 00:40. I have been thinking about Iain Davis’s magisterial essay series on multipolarity – the prospective global power dispensation proposed by the WEF, the UN, and all the other internationalist bodies, and advanced via the BRICS nations in opposition to America’s current monopolarity. Unless a fifth appears, it is a four part series: I heartily recommend the series to one and all. Davis is a libertarian. So not every position he adopts is agreeable from our standpoint, or wholly free of the conventional liberal dictates and blindspots. He has no holistic identitarian or ethnological reading of our race and kind. He does not fully comprehend the Western elites’ long campaign against our life. He has no critique of the Jewish paradigm. There is no evidence that he even has an understanding of it. His is, therefore, a view of a single, completely political project conceived by past generations of Western elites, and adapting to various challenges along the way (such as the fall of the Soviet Union). But that simplification aside, to my mind his Multipolarity series is still a signal achievement in the dissenting analysis of power in this world, and unequivocally presents to us the Chinese, or Russo-Chinese, piece in the jigsaw. Accordingly, it explains the respective, perfectly consonant Chinese and Russian power strategies we witness today. These strategies are not solely the products of Russian or Chinese agency. To all intents and purposes, they are facilitated by a Western elite which has, for four decades or more, been pursuing the replacement of Western power - and thus the basis of the elites’ own power - with a radically general distribution of economic and geopolitical power. In the modern language of internationalism that means transitioning from leadership by America and the other G7 economies of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom to leadership by the G20 economies, ie, adding to those seven the five BRICS countries of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa and the other developing G20 economies of Argentina, Australia, Indonesia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, and Turkey. To a greater or lesser extent all of these last seven are there to make up the numbers and provide a semblance of global action. The real revolutionary change is being wrought by China and Russia, but ... only because the Western elites licenced it. This, then, is the background against which Donald Trump’s parochial and unfulfilled campaign to Make America Great Again figured as a grand heresy in the minds of the entire Western political, governmental, academic, cultural, corporate and banking class. It is the background against which Brexit has never been effectively pursued (beyond a formal, only partial separation) by any British government since the momentous vote of 23rd June 2016. Both of these developments stood as a popular rebuke to the ruling classes for the manner in which they had narrowed party and thus national politics to exclude the life-interests of the mass of white Americans and native British respectively. Supporters in both polities rightfully expected change, including to the elites’ migration agenda. I don’t need to detail the actual outcome, only the fact that the elites regard themselves as absolute rulers of our world, and no wants and desires but their own will ever be actioned even if what was a social contract in Rousseau’s time has to become a social dictate in ours, or what was the legitimacy of government in Locke’s time has to become a lie.
Back in pre-Covid times, within a month of Boris Johnson’s great Brexit election victory of 12th December 2019, the globalist monster began to assert its will on the new United Kingdom government. From that first moment of hope betrayed it’s been downhill all the way. The present crisis afflicting Liz Truss’s government, if one can call it that without heavy irony, is the lowest point so far. The country’s first African Chancellor of the Exchequer is out on his ear, guilty of cutting taxes without cutting expenditure. No one believes that Truss herself can survive more than a month. The candidate she soundly defeated for party leader, the Indian midget Rishi Sunak, is now widely expected to replace her in a coronation event, without a further vote among the party members in the country. Isabel Oakeshott has set out the coup in all its audacity at The Spectator (paywalled):
So, what is one to say when such schemers and deceivers are in the ascendency, disposing of the party rule-book and the voice of the membership in the country. There is no respect, no fear, no dignity, no sense of right and wrong, or of fair play. There is just ambition and opportunism, and much arrogance. To an outsider, the overall impression is of something dead or dying, in a poisoned world of many dead and dying things; a sentiment rather accurately expressed by a commenter on the thread to Oakeshott’s article, Demosthenes by name:
If the plotters succeed in installing Sunak at No.10 it is inevitable that a terrible punishment awaits the Conservative Party at the next election, scheduled by December 2024. One awaits the next word from Nigel Farage, perhaps in the ear of Oakeshott’s live-in boyfriend Richard Tice, who runs Farage’s former Brexit Party under the title Reform UK.
What if the probability of Putin detonating a nuke in Ukraine before 2023 were 7%, as is the current estimate at the Metaculus prediction “market”? At the very least you should consider taking out insurance in the form of thinking about what will happen to the monetary regime relative to your local property rights. Militia Money is Property Money defining its sovereigns—“those who place their flesh, blood and bone between chaos and civilization”—as those who are registered for the draft. This definition overcomes a number of barriers to putting Property Money into practice:
Moreover, because the draft is currently restricted to men, Militia Money ameliorates the catastrophe befalling the developed world whose economies outbid young men for the fertile years of economically valued women—thereby depleting from the next generation economically valuable characteristics. As Militia Money is adopted, it is likely that the existing political entities will, using Israel as an exemplar, attempt to re-impose this catastrophe befalling civilization by expanding the draft to include young women. This disingenuous tactic will backfire for 3 reasons:
The primary barrier to adoption of Property Money, hence Militia Money, will be the inability of property owners to recognize that property titles are founded on and granted by sovereign force. In discussing Militia Money with property owners, the best way of helping them recognize this origin of entitlement is to ask them whether they would prefer that their tax revenue go to politicians or to young men who are registered for the draft. Although it is true that most property owners—particularly employers—will have a low opinion of young men generally, forcing them to compare with politicians may help them. Obviously, as can be seen in the very wealthy and among employers who contribute to the Republican establishment candidates that are soft on immigration, some of these property owners will not be swayed. Moreover, they will likely recognize that Militia Money is a threat to them since they have sold out their people and their nation and will likely be seen as the traitors they are. But at least you will have given them a chance to escape that fate. Other property owners will recognize the business opportunities represented by the privatization of all functions of government. These property owners will be among the new Founders. See also “Property Money Quick Start Guide”
Yes to childbirth. And so forth. That pretty much sums up the ground on which Georgia Meloni, after yesterday’s election Italy’s first female prime minister, currently stands. As a nationalist myself, I would not categorise it as nationalism because it is not developed out of a philosophy of kind and home. It is, though, adjacent in parts. But her politics are almost entirely reactionary, and are, ultimately, articulated from a conception of human being which is Catholic and naturalistic, and thus socially conservative. Of course, in today’s progressive dominion that is radical and alarming to all those who have come to regard neo-Marxist imposts as the norm, even politically centrist. The Italian political Establishment has particularly good reason for such alarm. Meloni, 45, is a natural-born change agent. She does not come from their privileged world. She comes from the post-WW1 garden suburb of Garbatella in Rome, and something of the place flows in her veins. She speaks not of euros and the financing of Italy’s vast sovereign debt but of the things of the instinct and, as she says, “common sense”. In support of that she is passionate and combative, populist and brave. Occasionally at the dais when her voice rises and her tone hardens, she can sound demagogic; and doubtless that plays into the Establishment’s frequent association of her and her party Brothers of Italy with fascism and, of course, the r-word. Not unlike Marine Le Pen, she has reacted by removing people who have praised Mussolini or said something somewhere that could be construed as racism. Many party members might prefer a sturdy and unashamed line of attack to that. But she’s not trying to placate the Establishment but to reassure the voters, and evidently that strategy has paid off. We shall now see how the entitled political class and technocrats and the sclerotic governmental machine within Italy respond to her election. In Brussels, Ursula von der Leyen has already threatened “consequences” and spoken of “tools” to bring the Meloni government to heel if required. Much attention will be paid in Brussels as to who Meloni appoints as minister of finance. But it will also be interesting to see how Matteo Salvini and that great lover of partying with unclothed young ladies, the octagenarian Silvio Berlusconi, will be rewarded for their parties’ participation in the governing alliance. Both are displaying sympathies for Vladimir Putin, probably in Salvini’s case because the Russian autocrat extended banking facilities to his party. But Meloni, a staunch supporter of NAT0 and the Ukrainian people, speaks instead of responsibility. For all her ringing hostility to the deeds of globalism she isn’t buying the anti-Western argument. I hope we learn more about that. As for Salvini, if he is back at the Interior Ministry he might have the pleasure of aborting his own trial for blocking NGO vessels full of North and Sub-Saharan African immigrants in the salad days of the 5-Star/League coalition. He would also have the pleasure of testing von der Leyen as he reduces the immigrant quota the Draghi government agreed upon to nil. Italian politics promises to be more entertaining than ever.
This essay is the third instalment in the on-going authenticity series but the second of my reflections on technology and its totalistic, artificialising co-option of the life which we in the West know today and lead, and can lead; and as things stand will know much more co-optively tomorrow. This is not an especially ideological essay, or a “nationalist” essay. Its intent is to further shape our consideration of technology’s synergy with Man, the technological animal. To that end, a distinction will be made between the effects and meanings of the four ages in this, a history almost as ancient as the first hominid. The essay will be followed by a final offering in this triptych titled Opening and Presence, which will ask what, as the only viable conclusion to be drawn from Martin Heidegger’s valedictory advice on technology, the thought and speech of a naturally emergent life would actually look and sound like in practise - which is also, as it happens, where we begin here! 2. INTO HEIDEGGER WORLD OR INTO THE HYPER-WORLD
Here is a radical thought. What shared future, within reasonable material parameters, would our people desire and choose for our progeny? Let’s pitch that future not too far ahead: say, that of the adult lives of our grandchildren. What if that question - admittedly, a question which, in its fullness is not easily framed - could be answered definitively enough to then adduce a majority opinion? What if that opinion could be employed as a filter for politics such that everything incompatible with it, everything restrictive or exploitative of it, is itself restricted or excluded completely? Other things being equal, what if by careful discrimination and curation, government could create the conditions in which the desire of the nationalist heart can become the reality of our people’s life? Only eight years (we are told) short of the age of Technocracy, you may be thinking that this is a somewhat naïve and idealistic bet on politicians’ respect for our ethnic person, as well as for the liberty and democracy they affect to hold sacred. But, actually, it is a bet on the timelessness of human authenticity and its agency in a world in which Power is intent on bringing forth no less human artifice, diminishment, and subjection than ever did Philip K Dick with his Tyrell Corps replicants. As Heidegger himself said in his long essay Discourse on Thinking, published in 1966, with material written eleven years earlier:
That said, what if the present-day Tyrell Corps were, in fact, operating from a sounder psychological and sociobiological basis than we nationalists? What if authenticity resided deeply enough in, and synergised enough with, technology itself that it - authenticity - transported us not to Heidegger World but to Technocracy? It is a terrifying thought that we may belong too much to modernity and the technological paradigm to escape even the negatives of its grip upon us ... that its diminishments are also a part of us. But this is the inescapable conclusion to be drawn from Heidegger’s appeal to his goddess of truth. Let us examine it. The ages of the god of the forge We can clear the way a little by finding a meaning - not necessarily only Heidegger’s - for “what makes up what is most modern technology’s own.” To that end, we shall not be examining technologies as such, or how men have thought technologically of Nature (the outer meaning of “standing reserve”). Rather, we shall trace the eras of technology’s making of Man in pursuit of Heidegger’s “construct”. We will find throughout that development, from its beginning to the present day, technology’s innermost power of human transformation of his body, his personhood, and his mind’s ordering of reality. First, though, let’s trace the history of Man and his technology and, too, their seeming future. Technology as such pre-dates the genus Homo sapiens. Driven by life’s will to survival and continuity, our hominid ancestors increased the possibility of life in their environments by whatever means their creativity allowed. “Found” clubs and projectiles for hunting and fighting and stones as hand-tools were the beginning of technology. Although there is a 700,000 year break between the date - four million years ago - assigned to the development of bipedalism and the archaeological evidence for simple “found” tools (from the age of Australopithecus or “Lucy”), it is bipedalism which is usually associated with the evolution of tool-use and tool-making. Certainly, bipedalism freed the hands for additional tasks, particularly during movement, and there is no better candidate for the absolute point of origin of all our technology today. There is another 700,000 year break to the Olduwan Industry period of some 2.6 million years ago, to which the oldest knapped stone tools have been dated. Subsequently, hand actions such as throwing, cupping, and gripping have shaped technology and been shaped by it. Within the whole organism of the hominid body, including the brain, it was the hand which most directly testified to that wild synergy, and the hand that, by its dexterity and versatility, extended the crude striking of stone against stone and stone against animal flesh to the working of wood, and of skins, clay and natural fibres, and the control of fire. With each advance the world opened up as an ever more negotiable and manageable evolutionary space. Our ancient predecessors made themselves as they made the world about them. For example, they acquired control over fire perhaps 400,000 years ago, setting in motion the rich history of fuel. So, when Homo sapiens arose between 260,000 and 350,000 years ago, they were essentially pre-technologised, and technology itself was inseparable from human being because both were entered synergetically into the natural, daily processes of life. This first, organic phase of technologisation, the phase of physical synergy, lasted as the only phase through the pre-Neolithic, when animal husbandry, a true symbiotic form, first developed. It took another 5,000 years until the Neolithic Revolution of 10,000-11,000 years ago for the cutting and dressing of stone to produce permanent structures (as, for example, at Göbekli Tepe in Anatolia, dating from around 9,000-10,000 years ago, or nearby Karahan Tepe, a ritual site which may be two thousand years older). Within a millenium or two, crop farming came to (what we know today as) the Fertile Crescent. The farmer and the stone tool-maker together made possible the urban settlement; and, thereby, civilisation itself. The metal-worker - Hephaestus at his forge - joined them 3,000 years later. The potter’s wheel took another 3,000 years to arrive.
James Bowery has raised a question about the cognitive verities of our being-in-the-world, characterising it as a point on a faith continuum. In a comment on “The final question” thread he writes:
Well, I do wish to “interject” some qualitative distinctions; or at least to set forth the meaning and relation of things as I understand them. So, to that end ... I will not spend too much time on the first, which is the human brain’s rendering of a representative reality from the raw data of the world beyond the organism. Obviously, the brain stands at the apogee of three and half billion years of evolution, from the first simple cells which sensed light in darkness and succeeded in transmitting that capacity to other cells. Figuratively speaking, God was light. Non-figuratively, the whole, limitless noumenal truth is le soleil absolu, but the form in which we limited beings re-cognise it is strictly shackled to planet earth. My favoured guide Martin Heidegger accepted the Cartesian subject-object duality but placed human being in the “there-then”, which is a human-scale objectification of that whole truth. But the whole question of how we are evolved to “sense light” therein, how we autogenetically construct from the input of our five senses a sublime simulacrum limited to our own cortex, and how we then filter it through the great external-facing, associative systems, remains; and it is, of course, that most important and ancient mystery which is the Mind-Body problem. There are many theoretical solutions, the most populous among academics being species of physicalism and emergentism. With so much post-Christian, blue planet, Gaia thinking prevalent in the West it is perhaps not a surprise that pan-psychism is making a bit of a comeback. Beyond formal academia, in the badlands, Chris Langan’s CTMU appears to be both pan-psychist and a mathematical proof. Even by the standards for pan-psychism, it is not taken seriously by academics outside his own immediate high-IQ cohort. It is at least complete, or claimed to be. Not one of the other theories are claimed by anyone as adequate at this stage. All are problematic. All are contested. No one has anything even close to a definite and provable account of brain function. This is true even of accounts of how the sleeping brain conjures into existence its dream-world. We know in our waking hours that dreams are brilliant, strange fictions. But however improbable or fractured a dream may be, once the brain chemistry flows we are totally immersed and certain of the dream’s material reality. One would think that this contradiction might help in the formal search for a solution, but it hasn’t yet. Anyway, in my distinctly informal estimation, certainty speaks of an evolutionary attention to survival and continuity which is so needful that all that is Mind derives from it and serves it, and so constant that no moment of human experience escapes it, not even what we dream. The mechanics of it are absolute.
Given that the West is saddled with a tradition of freedom and democracy (which its elites want to retire, of course, but never mind for now), and given that a Sino-Russian global hegemony is the end-game of the Ukraine adventure, should we not look into the Eurasian face, mindful of its natural affinity for authoritarianism and conformism, and ask the final question: Would it be easier for us to fight for our people’s life and land in a Western hegemonic system or in a socialist system under the tutelage of, principally, China, with input from Russia, India, and Iran, if these are indeed the alternatives?
Today, a nice piece by the writer Frank Wright appeared on the state of affairs appeared at what we must now call TCW but was, until a few weeks ago, The Conservative Woman, virtually the last surviving British “right-wing” site at which a free man can sound off. Frank is awake, to put it really rather mildly. He seems to model that rare conservative estate which is one step away from nationalism, and which is too well rooted to be susceptible to the customary scarecrow tactics. His piece, titled “The more normal you are, the more the Regime hates you”, and is well worth a read. Very rarely, the writers of pieces above the line venture below and converse with the hoi polloi. But Frank was kind enough, or crazy enough, to get himself into a conversation with me, which went something like this:
I don’t know if Frank will show up here. But it would be good to explore his position in greater detail.
Page 4 of 337 | First Page | Previous Page | [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] [ 6 ] | Next Page | Last Page |
|
![]() Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) Computer say no by Guessedworker on Thursday, 09 May 2024 15:17. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Wed, 21 Aug 2024 23:22. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Wed, 21 Aug 2024 04:31. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'A year in the trenches' on Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:20. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'A year in the trenches' on Sat, 17 Aug 2024 23:08. (View) Manc commented in entry 'A year in the trenches' on Sat, 17 Aug 2024 12:54. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'A year in the trenches' on Fri, 16 Aug 2024 22:53. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'A year in the trenches' on Thu, 15 Aug 2024 23:48. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'A year in the trenches' on Thu, 15 Aug 2024 12:06. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'A year in the trenches' on Wed, 14 Aug 2024 23:43. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'A year in the trenches' on Wed, 14 Aug 2024 22:34. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'A year in the trenches' on Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:15. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'A year in the trenches' on Sat, 10 Aug 2024 22:53. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'A year in the trenches' on Fri, 09 Aug 2024 20:27. (View) Manc commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Fri, 09 Aug 2024 09:19. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Thu, 08 Aug 2024 23:05. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Thu, 08 Aug 2024 11:45. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Thu, 08 Aug 2024 11:26. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Thu, 08 Aug 2024 08:50. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Thu, 08 Aug 2024 04:44. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Slaying The Dragon' on Thu, 08 Aug 2024 04:31. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Slaying The Dragon' on Wed, 07 Aug 2024 19:58. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Slaying The Dragon' on Wed, 07 Aug 2024 19:15. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Wed, 07 Aug 2024 11:35. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Slaying The Dragon' on Wed, 07 Aug 2024 06:04. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Wed, 07 Aug 2024 04:08. (View) Manc commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Tue, 06 Aug 2024 21:26. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Tue, 06 Aug 2024 10:15. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Mon, 05 Aug 2024 12:38. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Mon, 05 Aug 2024 10:25. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Sun, 04 Aug 2024 23:24. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Sun, 04 Aug 2024 21:16. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Sun, 04 Aug 2024 20:06. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Sun, 04 Aug 2024 17:52. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Sun, 04 Aug 2024 14:22. (View) ![]() ![]() |